Trump’s Special Circumstances

Redacted is an independent platform, unencumbered by external factors or restrictive policies, on which Clayton and Natali Morris bring you quality information, balanced reporting, constructive debate, and thoughtful narratives.

On Monday, the FBI said that there are no threats to President Trump’s safety for his upcoming inauguration. And then it turned around and released a Special Counsel report saying that he was involved in criminal activity. Does anyone else see this contradiction?

How can they simultaneously impugn and protect the same person?

Special Counsel Jack Smith, who a court has ruled was inappropriately appointed, wrote in the report that the President should have been held accountable for “an unprecedented criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the election in order to retain power” but he would not be further prosecuted due to his presidential immunity. He makes it clear that he would move forward with prosecution if not for Trump’s win.

President Trump unleashed a fury on his social media calling Smith a “lamebrain prosecutor who was unable to get his case tried before the Election, which I won in a landslide. THE VOTERS HAVE SPOKEN!!!”

Related Articles

Join the Redacted Community

Don’t miss out on the latest news and in-depth stories. Subscribe to Redacted newsletter for daily insights that matter, delivered directly to your inbox.

Related Articles