![]()
The FBI says that the man who opened fire at a Dallas ICE facility had Anti-ICE inscriptions on the bullet shavings, leading us to believe that he was a leftist.
But that is the FBI’s narrative of this and the FBI lies. This feels like a familiar and stupid exercise in class warfare as of late.
A crazy person does something demonic, authorities and the media try to pin their motive on one group, their social media is analyzed, and no questions are ever answered while partisans fight over it on X. The exercise itself feels dangerous.
A recent article from The Atlantic says that “left-wing terrorism is on the rise” but the article refuses to call out the far-left. According to The Atlantic, there is only the “far-right” and “left-wing” and the right is currently not doing violence because Trump is in office so “their interests are already being taken care of.”
Also, according to The Atlantic, violent lefties are nicer because they only target one person like Charlie Kirk or President Trump, whereas violent right-wingers take out whole groups. Wrong. Several recent school shooters were trans radical lefties, did they forget this?
It can feel satisfying to blame entire political groups for these tragedies but even with this skewed viewpoint, what really is the point? If officials and the media keep slapping ideological labels on attacks while withholding hard facts, the labeling isn’t to uncover truth or stop future violence—it’s to steer public opinion and keep control of the narrative. We can’t keep playing this game.