Journalist Seymour Hersh published a follow-up to his investigation that alleges that the United States blew up the Nord Stream Pipeline with the help of Norway. In this week’s follow-up, he answers the question: Why Norway?
He points out that Norway has a 60-year relationship with the United States to start wars. In fact, they were successful in starting the Vietnam War with help of the Norwegian Navy and top-of-the-line ships called “Nasty Class,” which surely sounds cooler in Norwegian than it does in English.
We are being asked here to remember the Vietnam War, which almost nobody now thinks was a good idea. It was an age-old they-fired-first lie that cost millions of lives, mostly innocent Vietnamese civilians and close to 60,000 U.S. soldiers. And Norway here is a complicit actor yet again.
So if the Vietnam War had a similar origin story with Norway as a partner in crime, it would be naive not to ask: Is this the sequel?
Today is the one-year anniversary of the start of the conflict in Ukraine and there will be a lot of media posturing about it. You may have already noticed.
NATO honored the date by comparing the conflict with the heroes’ journeys from pop culture references including Star Wars, Harry Potter, Avatar, Braveheart, The Avengers, Dune and The Shawshank Redemption. This is a not-so-subtle way to reduce the conflict to a good vs. evil dichotomy that will maybe inspire some and turn off others. (I’m in the turned off camp. Leave my Potter out of this!)
The United Nations passed a truly symbolic non-binding resolution calling on Russia to leave Ukraine. A representative from China condemned Western leaders for failing to bring about peace saying that the “brutal facts offer [an] ample proof that sending weapons will not bring peace.” China released a document demanding peace negotiations begin immediately and that the West abandon “the Cold War mentality.”
Time To Move Into Precious Metals
America's largest precious metals company is ready to help.
Gold just hit a six-month high as investors started pouring back into precious metals on the good news. If you have your retirement in a dollar format, then it will continue to lose value every day that it's there in a bank. It's time to move some of your retirement into gold and silver and away from government currencies.
Gold and Silver have sustained for over 4,000 years while every government currency in world history has collapsed. Every one of them. Will this time be any different? Of course not.
Right now, you can get a FREE gold kit and learn how gold and silver can help you protect your family against these central banks. Visit LearRedacted.com right now to get your TOTALLY FREE Gold Kit and start taking action today.
Jamie Dimon, head of JP Morgan, is under pressure to answer for his connection to Jeffrey Epstein. Lawsuits from Epstein’s victims say that the bank protected him and that Dimon was personally involved in doing so.
The plaintiffs are asking the bank to produce communication with Epstein and his employees, including personal communication with Dimon. The bank has refused to do so saying it would be unduly burdensome.
One of the cases was brought by the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein did business. The country alleges that “Dimon was personally involved both in decisions to retain Epstein’s accounts in the face of acknowledged high-risk activity . . . and in meetings and review related to Epstein’s referrals of prominent and high-wealth potential clients.”
JP Morgan denies that it made special exceptions to keep Epstein’s business, despite red flags about his banking activity. The bank did move quickly to stop doing business with Kanye West though.
The British Medical Journal published a report this week refuting the notion that there is strong evidence behind medical treatment for gender dysphoria. There isn’t.
Trans activists like to say that puberty blockers and cross sex hormones are reversible and safe and that medical surgeries such as breast removal and hysterectomies are neutral and safe acts. They are not and no research exists to support those claims. Experts won’t even study breast binders on children because it would be unethical to do so.
Investigative reporter Jennifer Bloch goes over the data around medicalisation of transgender children. She points out that all medical professionals have access to the same data but choose to interpret it in different ways. In Europe, governments have concluded that medical interventions have risks that outweigh the benefits and call for psychological rather than medical support for gender dysphoria.
Yet the U.S. is all in on gender affirmation that includes surgery and synthetic hormones. They can say that it is a safe way to be but they cannot say that this position is “evidence based.” It is simply not.
SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM!
Click here to go to our store to grab some of our exclusive Merchandise.
This newsletter is written and researched by Natali Morris. Please feel free to reach Natali at [email protected] for any editorial feedback.