SHOP

🚨 Round-Up the Criminals – June 26 2026

Build your Real Estate Portfolio
with our help every step of the way. Book Your Free Strategy Session

 

Redacted
Clayton & Natali Morris
Delete Me

Happy Friday

Russian convoys are discovering that modern drone warfare has made it impossible to transport highly flammable fuel. So, in an attempt to slip through unnoticed, so as not to be a target, Russia unveiled revolutionary stealth fuel tanker technology: painting the word “milk” on trucks.

Photo credit: MSN

MARKETS

Gold

$4,009.36

Silver

$56.58

Bitcoin

$59,952.46

Dow

51,920.62

S&P

7,357.49

Nasdaq

25,358.60

*Stock data as of market close, cryptocurrency data as of 5:00 a.m. ET.

Lead: Supreme Court Backs Bayer

Photo credit: Common Dreams

The Supreme Court just slammed the door on nearly 70,000 cancer victims.

In a deeply disappointing 7-2 ruling, the justices shielded chemical giant Bayer-Monsanto from state-level product liability lawsuits over its weed killer, Roundup, and its failure to include a warning on the label about the risks of cancer.

How exactly did this case come about?

John Durnell, a St. Louis resident, sued Monsanto in 2019, alleging that decades of using glyphosate, which is the active ingredient in Roundup, caused him to develop non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a type of blood cancer.

The jury sided with Durnell in 2023, awarding him $1.25 million in damages. But after an appeals court upheld the verdict, Monsanto petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case in April 2025.

Impacting the recent ruling was Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s majority opinion that: The EPA has “repeatedly concluded that glyphosate is not likely to cause cancer,” and therefore has not required “pesticides like Roundup to include a cancer warning on their labels.” That means that, “as a matter of federal law, Monsanto legally must use a label without a cancer warning unless and until EPA approves or requires a change.”

Not likely to cause cancer?

Are Kavanaugh’s pockets being lined? Has he not bothered to review the evidence?

IARC classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans,” and this was posted directly on the WHO’s website, where it reads, “data from all of the studies combined show a statistically significant association between non-Hodgkin lymphoma and exposure to glyphosate.”

And if glyphosate were safe, then why have 33 countries banned it?

On top of this, the EPA did indeed label the product possibly carcinogenic after a 1980s study revealed that mice that were given glyphosate developed tumors at statistically significant rates.

However, that was swept under the rug. Monsanto lobbied the EPA for six years to reverse the classification, and the agency changed its finding. Multiple studies came out afterward that presented evidence that the product was safe. But it was found that they were ghostwritten by Monsanto’s own scientists.

Meanwhile, Monsanto continued to take steps to protect its profits, not its customers.

Case in point… In 2025 alone, Bayer spent over $9 million in lobbying efforts, and millions more in previous years. The company sent representatives to Washington, which paid off because the Trump administration now has Monsanto’s back on glyphosate.

How can this be the case when HHS Secretary RFK Jr. said himself that glyphosate causes cancer?

Also in 2025, legislators in 11 states introduced bills to effectively give legal immunity to pesticide makers. Why would multiple states bother to do this? Could it be because Bayer’s fingerprints are all over it?

The Supreme Court ruling in favor of Bayer-Monsanto confirms that if a company or industry has enough lobbyists or the capability to fake science reports, then its profits will be secured at the expense of keeping U.S. citizens safe.

What’s next? Drug manufacturers arguing that FDA approval alone should protect them from lawsuits and product recalls?

Regardless of where you stand on Roundup, or any product for that matter, Americans shouldn’t lose the right to present their case before a jury and let the evidence speak for itself.

Take Back a Little More of Your Privacy

DeleteMe

We spend a lot of time talking about governments, Big Tech, and the growing surveillance economy. But there’s another industry quietly profiting from your personal information: data brokers.

Many people-search websites collect and sell details like your name, address, phone number, and family connections—making that information widely available online.

That’s why many Redacted viewers use DeleteMe.

DeleteMe helps remove your personal information from hundreds of data broker and people-search websites, helping reduce the amount of personal data circulating online. Their privacy experts handle the work for you, and Wirecutter recently named DeleteMe the #1 data removal service.

Learn more: JoinDeleteMe.com/REDACTED

Redacted Featured Video

Did you miss our last live show? No problem, you can catch the replay here! And don’t miss this segment we did recently with SJSU earthquake geologist, Dr. Kimberly Blisniuk, where we discuss the possibility of a massive earthquake hitting the state of California.

One small thing that helps
If this reporting matters to you, please hit Forward and send this email to one friend who would value Redacted.
That one action helps us reach real people outside the algorithm.

News by the Numbers

Photo credit: The New York Times

20%. That’s how much Apple has increased prices on its MacBooks and iPads. It blames the price hike on memory chip shortages caused by the AI boom.

188. That’s how many people have lost their lives in the Venezuela earthquakes, with 1,500 reported injured. Those numbers will likely climb as search-and-rescue efforts continue.

1 Million. That’s how many New York City apartments are now covered by a two-year rent freeze. This is great for tenants, but what about the landlords?

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM

Click here to grab some of our exclusive merchandise.

Rewards

                        

– Redacted News Team

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Don’t miss out – Subscribe to Redacted here.

Want to support our independent journalism and snag some Redacted gear? Visit our store for hats, mugs, t-shirts, and more.

*Some of the links in this newsletter may come from our affiliates or sponsors, meaning we could earn a commission if you purchase.

At Redacted, we believe in digging deep into every story—and sometimes that means we invest in (or use) the products and services we cover.

Please remember: we’re not financial advisors. Our content is for educational and informational purposes only. Always perform your own due diligence and consult a qualified professional regarding your personal financial decisions. All investments involve risk.

Thanks for reading Redacted and standing up for independent journalism.

Redacted Footer