![]()
Why are there so many oddities in the Charlie Kirk assassination?
One question serious thinkers are grappling with is the exit wound. If the weapon was indeed a Mauser Model 98 bolt-action rifle, there should have been an exit wound and quite likely others hit by the continuing trajectory of the bullet. But there wasn’t. Why?
A Turning Points spokesperson says that the bullet did not go through because “Charlie’s body stopped it.”
Andrew Kolvet said that the doctor told him this about Charlie Kirk: “His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.”
This does not help clear up the many discrepancies about this. The timeline of the events doesn’t add up. The text messages between the alleged killer and his gay lover seem ridiculously contrived.
Watching Republicans champion his death as a cause of the right feels premature because none of us can be sure that there was not a Deep State actor involved.
There is an old criminology refrain: “The killer cries at the funeral.”
Did they?