![]()
Just one day after President Trump publicly floated the idea of bombing Iran’s bridges and critical infrastructure, Iranian officials say that’s exactly what happened.
In Trump’s own words: “We’re not attacking at the highest level. The highest level is the bridges, which we can knock down. I would say in one day we could knock down every bridge in Iran, there’s not a thing they can do about it.”
Iran’s Foreign Ministry is now accusing the United States of committing a “blatant war crime” after airstrikes damaged two railway bridges, including one connecting Iran with Turkmenistan and China.
Iranian media also says another strike disrupted passenger rail service between Tehran and Mashhad, where millions of mourners gathered for the funeral procession of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The timing isn’t going unnoticed.
Targeting transportation routes during one of the country’s largest public gatherings raises obvious questions about whether the strikes were directed solely at military objectives.
U.S. Central Command acknowledged carrying out attacks on roughly 90 targets but has not confirmed whether the railway bridges were among them.
It’s hard to ignore the fact that Washington routinely condemns attacks on civilian infrastructure when carried out by its adversaries. Yet when similar allegations are directed at the U.S., the conversation quickly shifts to military necessity.
Whether the bridges were the intended target or not, expanding the battlefield to include civilian infrastructure creates a precedent that may not remain confined to Iran.