SHOP

He Fought for the American People, Not Israel

Redacted is an independent platform, unencumbered by external factors or restrictive policies, on which Clayton and Natali Morris bring you quality information, balanced reporting, constructive debate, and thoughtful narratives. Stay informed by visiting Redacted for the latest insights.

In one of the highest-stakes primaries of our lifetimes, voters in Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District unseated U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie.

If it were only that simple…

The sad reality is that the outcome didn’t actually reflect the will of ordinary Kentuckians, but the influence of billionaire donors and foreign lobbying interests tied to Israel.

What’s the evidence for this? $32 million was spent on just one small Kentucky primary. Doesn’t that seem a little strange?

Massie’s Trump-backed challenger, Ed Gallrein, an opponent who refused to debate Massie, has received support from powerful pro-Israel billionaire donors, alongside heavy involvement from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

“Track AIPAC” calculated that Gallrein had reeled in $15 million from AIPAC alone, while Massie’s campaign raised over $5.5 million through grassroots donations from ordinary Americans, with the average donation between $80 and $100.

Massie knew what he was up against, stating that his primary “turned into a referendum on whether Israel gets to buy seats in Congress. And what they found out is that my seat is really expensive.”

He’s right. The race became the most expensive primary contest in American history. Again, all for a single Kentucky primary. One that even prompted Pete Hegseth to travel to Kentucky on Monday to show his support for Gallrein.

Really, the Secretary of War takes the time to fly to Kentucky to rally for Massie’s opponent while we are in the middle of a war. Along with this, President Trump went to great lengths to turn the American people against a person he called “the worst Congressman in the history of our country.”

Trump even took to X to personally write a post about Massie rather than sticking to his usual pattern of recycling a Truth Social repost, which made the whole thing feel unusually desperate.

So why did Israel and the U.S. government go to such extremes to push Massie out? Because he refused to fall in line with powerful political interests and instead acted on what he believed was best for the American people.

Massie has repeatedly opposed U.S. military aid to Israel, but he rejected all foreign aid, not just to Israel but also to Egypt, Syria, and Ukraine. He introduced the “Americans Insist on Political Agent Clarity (AIPAC) Act,” which would require organizations to register as a foreign agent, and he has voted against foreign wars. He’s also pushed for transparency with the Epstein files, which Israel has its fingerprints on.

They can’t have someone in Congress who won’t comply, right? That’s why it was a desperate race to force Massie out of office.

Thomas Massie is one of the good guys who was willing to put everything on the line to fight for the American people. Losing his seat may not silence him, though. It could push him to continue fighting outside his government role and become even more dangerous to these groups.

Join the Redacted Community

Don’t miss out on the latest news and in-depth stories. Subscribe to Redacted newsletter for daily insights that matter, delivered directly to your inbox.

Sdira Wealth

Learn how to invest in cash-flowing properties in high-performing markets. Discover strategies for reducing taxes, protecting your money, and growing real wealth. Faster and smarter.

Build Sustainable Wealth
with Real Estate
Transform your financial future in three months flat
Join Clayton and Natali’s nine-module online program featuring bite-sized video lessons, actionable exercises, and an exclusive mastermind community so you can crush debt, create passive income, and secure your family’s financial future…All at your own pace.

Hot Off The Press

Fresh intel from our blog, podcast and news channels, sorted
newest first. Always see what just dropped.

Updates
Clayton Morris

Gaslighting the Gas Market

President Trump is demanding that gas companies lower prices immediately. The problem is that gas prices aren’t set by presidential decree. They are driven primarily by global crude oil prices, refining capacity, inventories, taxes, and competition. This is reminiscent of President Biden blaming grocery stores and retailers for inflation. When prices are politically inconvenient, the temptation is always to blame the companies at the end of the supply chain. Oil prices have fallen sharply over the past week, nearly erasing the “war premium” that followed the U.S.-Iran conflict. But that drop appears to be driven more by market sentiment than by a meaningful improvement in supply. Commodity strategists warned Monday that traders may be pricing in an overly optimistic outlook while underestimating the remaining supply risks. During the conflict, the United States authorized the release of 172 million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to help stabilize markets.

Updates
Clayton Morris

Weapons of Mass Lobbying

Should a defense contractor get to enrich shareholders with stock buybacks while it’s behind schedule on taxpayer-funded government contracts? The House will debate exactly that question this week as lawmakers consider an amendment to the annual defense bill that would prohibit certain Pentagon contractors from buying back their own stock if they are failing to meet production and delivery requirements. The idea is simple: if taxpayers are paying you to build missiles, ships, and fighter jets, maybe build the missiles, ships, and fighter jets before rewarding Wall Street. Enter the lobbyists. America’s weapons makers have deployed their most powerful weapon yet: their lobbyists, sent to kill the bill before it can reach the battlefield. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable, and major defense industry groups are urging lawmakers to kill the proposal, arguing that it amounts to the federal government dictating how private companies allocate

Updates
Clayton Morris

No, Iran Didn’t Say That

The U.S. and Iran traded bombs over the weekend, despite ongoing peace negotiations. By Sunday afternoon, both sides appeared ready to climb back down the ladder. Several outlets warned that “Iran” now says it has no choice but to build a nuclear bomb. Not true. Iranian media published an opinion piece making that argument. That is not the same thing as an official Iranian government position, an IRGC directive, or a policy announcement from Tehran. The piece argued that Iran needs nuclear deterrence to force the U.S. and Israel to negotiate from a position of equality. That is a domestic strategic argument, not a declaration that Iran is building a bomb. Iran’s official position remains that nuclear weapons are forbidden under Ayatollah Khamenei’s fatwa, first publicly reported in 2003 and later cited by Iran at the IAEA. So no, “Iran” did not announce that it is building a nuclear

Updates
Clayton Morris

Let Them Bake

It’s hard to imagine worse optics. As much of Europe baked under a heat wave, the European Commission reportedly shut off air conditioning on the lower floors of its Brussels headquarters on Friday while keeping it running on the upper floors. Temperatures climbed above 97 degrees Fahrenheit. Guess where European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and her senior staff have their offices. The top floors. For years, Brussels has lectured Europeans that they must consume less energy, lower their expectations, and make personal sacrifices in the name of climate policy. But when the building got too hot, the sacrifice apparently wasn’t meant to be shared equally. The message couldn’t be clearer: austerity for the staff downstairs, comfort for the ruling class upstairs.

Updates
Clayton Morris

Supreme Court Backs Bayer

The Supreme Court just slammed the door on nearly 70,000 cancer victims. In a deeply disappointing 7-2 ruling, the justices shielded chemical giant Bayer-Monsanto from state-level product liability lawsuits over its weed killer, Roundup, and its failure to include a warning on the label about the risks of cancer. How exactly did this case come about? John Durnell, a St. Louis resident, sued Monsanto in 2019, alleging that decades of using glyphosate, which is the active ingredient in Roundup, caused him to develop non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a type of blood cancer. The jury sided with Durnell in 2023, awarding him $1.25 million in damages. But after an appeals court upheld the verdict, Monsanto petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case in April 2025. Impacting the recent ruling was Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s majority opinion that: The EPA has “repeatedly concluded that glyphosate is not likely to

Updates
Clayton Morris

The Military Build-Up

Ford and General Motors are in discussions with defense contractors about converting some of their factories to produce military weapons. Interesting timing, considering we’re supposedly winding down the latest war. Speaking to reporters this week, President Trump said that companies, including General Motors and Ford, are discussing plans to manufacture weapons such as Patriot air-defense missiles and Tomahawk cruise missiles as part of a major expansion of U.S. military production. “I know General Motors is all excited about building weapons now,” Trump said, adding that some civilian factories could be converted for military use as part of what he described as a “big strong economic push.” The proposal comes after reports that the Pentagon has been meeting with major manufacturers about shifting idle production lines toward weapons production, reviving a World War II-style strategy of turning America’s industrial base into a wartime machine. Why the sudden urgency? Years of wasting

Join the Redacted Rebellion

Get insider knowledge, bold strategies, and the truth they don’t want you to know–delivered straight to your inbox.