SHOP

Internet Searches Under Government Watch

Redacted is an independent platform, unencumbered by external factors or restrictive policies, on which Clayton and Natali Morris bring you quality information, balanced reporting, constructive debate, and thoughtful narratives. Stay informed by visiting Redacted for the latest insights.


What if simply typing an address into Google was enough to put you on a federal watch list?

That’s essentially what happened after newly unsealed court records revealed that the Justice Department ordered Google to identify 311 users who searched for the Republican National Committee or the Democratic National Committee headquarters during the first five days of January 2021. The demand was made because pipe bombs were discovered outside the RNC and DNC headquarters.

According to Google’s own legal challenge, the warrant swept up ordinary citizens, party volunteers, journalists, and anyone else who happened to search for a committee’s street address or contact information.

Google argued the request was “grossly overbroad” and amounted to the kind of general search the Fourth Amendment was designed to prevent.

Apparently, constitutional protections stop at the search bar.

Citing United States v. Grubbs, the judge ruled that Google had no legal standing to challenge the warrant before it was executed.

So those who did nothing more than search for a committee’s street address had their identities, email addresses, payment information, and account data turned over to the government without ever being notified because a nondisclosure order prevented Google from telling them.

Today, it’s a Google search for a political address that lands citizens on a federal watch list. Tomorrow, it could be a search for a protest, with the list of monitored search terms continuing to grow.

Google searches are just a snapshot of what’s really going on here, though.

Because things like government-monitored internet searches, mandatory tracking systems in vehicles, required biometric data collection for access to online services, and similar, all point toward a gradual expansion of a surveillance state, where privacy and freedoms will be a things of the past.

Join the Redacted Community

Don’t miss out on the latest news and in-depth stories. Subscribe to Redacted newsletter for daily insights that matter, delivered directly to your inbox.

Sdira Wealth

Learn how to invest in cash-flowing properties in high-performing markets. Discover strategies for reducing taxes, protecting your money, and growing real wealth. Faster and smarter.

Build Sustainable Wealth
with Real Estate
Transform your financial future in three months flat
Join Clayton and Natali’s nine-module online program featuring bite-sized video lessons, actionable exercises, and an exclusive mastermind community so you can crush debt, create passive income, and secure your family’s financial future…All at your own pace.

Hot Off The Press

Fresh intel from our blog, podcast and news channels, sorted
newest first. Always see what just dropped.

Updates
Clayton Morris

The Politics of the Rape Gangs Report

A new report by British MP Rupert Lowe claims that the U.K. has systematically enabled Muslim men to run “rape gangs” for decades, preying on vulnerable white British girls. The report argues that Islamic principles are a key driver of these crimes. It cites concepts including al-walā’ wa-l-barā’, claiming that they encourage hostility toward non-Muslims, male dominance, forced marriage, sexual exploitation of non-Muslim women, and a hierarchy that places Muslims above others. It is a shocking claim. But reading the survivor testimony raises a different question. The women described in the report were not typically kidnapped off the street and held captive by an organized trafficking cartel. Again and again, the stories describe girls from broken homes, girls failed by social services, girls suffering abuse at home, girls who became addicted to drugs and alcohol, and girls who repeatedly found themselves in the orbit of predatory men. None

Updates
Clayton Morris

A Deal Waiting to Fail

The U.S.-Iran peace deal that Trump announced now appears to be a genuine development and not just another social media stunt. But will Israel allow the deal to move forward? That’s far from certain. In fact, the signs point in the opposite direction. On Tuesday, Israel bombed a civilian area in Lebanon and then launched a second strike after emergency medical crews arrived. At this point, Trump seems to be at the end of his rope with Israel’s antics, publicly venting his frustrations with them: “Israel is fighting Hezbollah too long, and too many people are getting killed, and you don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you’re looking for somebody, because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses, and they’re not all Hezbollah.” “I didn’t like where two hours before we were signing the agreement that there was an attack in Lebanon, in Beirut.” So

Updates
Clayton Morris

China’s Nursery Connection

Baby monitors are supposed to help parents sleep better at night, right? But what if the device watching your child is also sending data through technology tied to a company linked to the Chinese military? That’s the issue at the center of a new lawsuit filed by the state of Missouri against baby monitor manufacturer Lorex. State officials accuse the company of concealing its relationship with Zhejiang Dahua Technology, a Chinese surveillance giant that was designated by the Pentagon as a Chinese military company in 2022. According to the lawsuit, Lorex marketed its cameras as secure and privacy-focused while failing to fully disclose the extent of its ties to Dahua. Missouri argues that consumers had a right to know who was behind the technology they were bringing into their homes. These aren’t just security cameras pointed at a driveway, as Missouri’s attorney general pointed out: “These cameras watch our babies

Updates
Clayton Morris

The Great Migration Mandate

The European Union’s new Migration Pact officially took effect on June 12, and it could become one of the most divisive policies Brussels has ever imposed on its member states. Under the new rules, countries that refuse to accept migrants assigned to them through the EU’s redistribution system can face penalties of up to €21,000 per migrant. For nations resisting the policy, the bill could quickly climb into the hundreds of millions of euros each year. As if migrants flooding their countries wasn’t costing them enough already. The pact also introduces accelerated asylum and border processing procedures, while granting migrants access to certain worker rights after just six months in the system, which could make Europe an even more attractive destination for migration. Supporters describe the pact as a fair way to share responsibility across Europe. Critics say it’s a system that favors bureaucracy over secure

Updates
Clayton Morris

The Deal That Changes Nothing

President Trump announced that a preliminary deal with Iran is “all signed” and that the Strait will be completely opened on Friday. Is there any truth to this? Because at this point, we sure do have reason to question these weekly “peace deal” announcements, don’t we? Especially when Trump posts absurd statements like this: “Iran has agreed to never have a Nuclear Weapon!” As for an actual deal itself, there could be some truth to it this time, seeing how Shehbaz Sharif, the prime minister of Pakistan, announced that the two sides had agreed on a deal, and Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs confirmed this as well, stating: “We are pleased to announce that the Peace Deal between the United States of America and Islamic Republic of Iran has been REACHED. Both sides have declared the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.” The keyword here is “Lebanon”.

Updates
Clayton Morris

Trump Says Deal. Iran Says Conditions.

President Trump announced that a deal with Iran has been reached and the Strait of Hormuz would be opened immediately. Iran, however, does not appear to be treating the matter as a finalized deal. A statement from the Secretariat of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council indicates that additional steps remain before any final agreement is reached. “The signing of this Memorandum of Understanding will be officially held on Friday, June 19,” according to the statement. “Negotiations for a final agreement will be postponed until after the other party has fulfilled its obligations under the Memorandum of Understanding.” It is significant that Iran has acknowledged the framework of a deal but it is not in fact a done deal. Iran’s conditions continue to include Lebanon, meaning Israel must cease its bombing campaign and military operations there. As he has on multiple occasions, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected calls for a

Join the Redacted Rebellion

Get insider knowledge, bold strategies, and the truth they don’t want you to know–delivered straight to your inbox.